Leonardo Catani vs Jonathan Binding Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L L W L
Form
L W W W L L L W W LH2H: Catani 1 - 0 Binding
They have played 2 sets in total, with Catani winning 2 and Binding winning 0. The last match between Catani and Binding was at the M15 Pune, 21-03-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Leonardo Catani getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leonardo Catani | 1 |
| Jonathan Binding | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats 
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:55:0 | Average Match Time | 1:55:0 |
| 57% (45/79) | 1st Serve % | 56% (46/82) |
| 69% (31/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (31/46) |
| 47% (16/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 43% (35/82) | Return Points Win % | 41% (32/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Leonardo Catani vs Jonathan Binding Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Catani 1 - 0 Binding
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Catani has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Binding has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Catani, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Binding has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Catani has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Binding has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Catani has won 50% of matches played (W/L 3/ 3), with Binding winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Catani has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 57/ 57), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Binding has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 52/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 19/ 22).
- Player level: In the last year, Catani has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 3/ 3), where as Binding has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Catani winning 1 times and Binding being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Catani winning 2 and Binding winning 0. The last match between Catani and Binding was at the M15 Pune, 21-03-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Leonardo Catani getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Catani and Binding have played a deciding set 0 times, with Catani winning 0 times and Binding 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Catani winning 1, and Binding 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Catani has played against opponents with an average rank of 148 while Binding has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Catani has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Binding has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Catani has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Binding has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Leonardo Catani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kenzo Koistila Larsson
Player
Leonardo Catani
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Hugo Ljung
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
36%
(
16 of
45)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Kazakov
Player
Leonardo Catani
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aaron Gil Garcia
Player
Leonardo Catani
56%
(
68 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
111)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
49%
(
59 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Venedikt Tsirikidze
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Yuichiro Inui
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
45%
(
42 of
93)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Jonathan Binding Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Finn Murgett
Player
Jonathan Binding
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Nicholas Jovanovski
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Catani
Player
Jonathan Binding
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Jonathan Binding
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
29 of
73)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Anvit Bendre
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Binding
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dalwinder Singh
Player
Jonathan Binding
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Catani vs Binding?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Catani Vs Binding is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (62/72) | Win/Loss | 53% (85/75) |
| 47% (143/163) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (196/173) |
| 49% (1442/1503) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (1846/1708) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 122 | Aces Total | 151 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 252 | Total Double Faults | 269 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 239.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 277.16 |
| 56% (2142/3841) | 1st Serve % | 61% (2032/3345) |
| 65% (1392/2142) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1393/2032) |
| 45% (764/1699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (609/1313) |
| 43% (156/359) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (119/271) |
| 40% (1484/3679) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1219/3202) |
| 46% (61/133) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (85/160) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (16/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (23/51) |
| 49% (19/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (23/49) |
| 89% (57/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (86/73) |
| 11% (57/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (86/13) |
| 14% (77/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (74/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
